Scientific Communication

This section deals with scientific communication. In particular, it focuses on the role of publishers, how the publishing industry has changed over the years, and what new opportunities are available for researchers in the modern era.

The case of Elsevier

These resources discuss in particular the editor Elsevier, as a case-study.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Publisher control of all scholarly infrastructure
    • How publishing groups have started to control all aspects of research output: from planning research questions, to literature review, to data collection, to peer review, to publication, to dissemination.
  • ๐Ÿ“‘ Jefferson Pooley - Surveillance Publishing
    • "This essay develops the idea of surveillance publishing, with special attention to the example of Elsevier. A scholarly publisher can be defined as a surveillance publisher if it derives a substantial proportion of its revenue from prediction products, fueled by data extracted from researcher behavior."
  • Navigating Risk in vendor data privacy practices, an analysis of Elsevier's ScienceDirect
  • ๐Ÿ“ SPARC's 2021 Update
    • SPARC is "a non-profit advocacy organization that supports systems for research and education that are open by default and equitable by design." (https://sparcopen.org/who-we-are/). This document "[...] suggests organizational changes in academic institutions to both (1) manage increasing strategic and ethical challenges and (2) deploy hammers and analyze data to better understand the needs and protect the interests of individuals and communities."
    • ๐Ÿ“ ๐Ÿ“ฅ ๐Ÿ”ป Direct PDF Link
  • ๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐Ÿ’ฌ Sci-hub, Elsevier and Wiley declare war on research communities in India

Alternatives to traditional publishing

Open Access

This section includes resources specifically about Open Access.

  • ๐Ÿข Berlin declaration on Open Access
    • The founding document of the Open Access movement, it delineates the requirement to move away from paywalled content in the era of the internet towards Open Access. It defines what Open Access is, and how to support the transition to the open paradigm.
  • ๐Ÿช ScienceOpen - Open Access Survey results
    • A survey of 60 researchers about Open Access.The low number of respondents makes the results not very reliable.
    • Sampling strategy is also not clear. This may have been a convenience sample, on people who participated in a ScienceOpen event, making the results not generalizable.
  • ๐Ÿ“‘ Shift academic culture through publication, an article discussing how exploitative publishers are a problem, especially discriminating poorer researchers.
  • European Commission - ๐Ÿข ๐Ÿ”ป Study of scientific publishing in Europe (2024), on the state of scientific publishing in Europe, including publishing costs.
  • ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿข Barometer of Open Science, data on the progressive shift to open publishing practices in France.
  • DoaJ - ๐Ÿ”จ Open Access Journal repository
  • Open Science Cafรจ - ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ’ Attivitร  europee per l'open access

Sherpa helps authors decide where to publish, including services that compile what their rights are after publication. See ๐Ÿ”จ About Sherpa for an overview:

  • ๐Ÿ”จ Sherpa Romeo: what are the archiving polices of different journal publishers? An author can go here to learn how to open up their articles, even when publishing in a closed-access journal.
  • ๐Ÿ”จ Sherpa Juliet: what are the publishing requirements of funding agencies? Authors can check the publishing requirements based on who funds their research.
  • ๐Ÿ”จ Sherpa Fact: combining data from Romeo and Juliet, it shows if journals are compliant with best publishing practices.

Some universities provide open access publishing services. An example is ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Sirio, for the University of Turin.

So called "hybrid journals" provide both open access and closed access articles. They are ๐Ÿข generally regarded are bad for open access.

Preprints

A Preprint is an article ready to be sent for peer reivew. Such versions of the articles :bookmark_tab: usually differ little with their peer-reviewed counterparts, and are therefore a valid open alternative to reading regular articles.

The coronavirus pandemic required immediate action. Preprints were essential for this, as they provided immediate knowledge to the public.